| Hafta | Konular | Ön Hazırlık |
| 1 |
Giriş: Karşılaştırmalı Anayasacılık |
Scheppele, K, L. (2003). The Agendas of Comparative Constitutionalism. Law and Courts, 13, 5-23. -Tushnet, M. (2006). Some Reflections on Method in Comparative Constitutional Law. In Choudhry, S (Eds), The Migration of Constitutional Ideas. (pp.67-83), Cambridge University Press. |
| 2 |
Anayasalar ve Anayasacılık |
Sartori, G. (1962). Constitutionalism: A Preliminary Discussion. The American Political Science Review, 56(4). -Sajó, A. (1999). Limiting Government: An Introduction to Constitutionalism. (pp. 50-68), Central European University Press. |
| 3 |
Anayasa Yapımı I |
Elster, J. (1995). Forces and Mechanisms in the Constitution-Making Process, Duke L.J., 45, p.364. -Partlett, W. (2012). Making Constitutions Matter: The Dangers of Constitutional Politics. In Current Post-Authoritarian Constitution-Making. Brook Journal of Int. Law, 38. |
| 4 |
Anayasa Yapımı II |
Lijphart A. (2004). Constitutional Design for Divided Societies. Journal of Democracy, 15, pp. 96-109. -Choudhry, S. (2008). Bridging comparative politics and comparative constitutional law: constitutional design in divided societies. In Choudhry, S (Eds), Constitutional Design for Divided Societies, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 3-40. |
| 5 |
Anayasal Haklar Rejimi |
Chilton, A., & Versteeg, M. (2020). How Constitutional Rights Matter. OUP. |
| 6 |
Veto Oyuncuları ve Güç Paylaşımı |
Tsebelis G. (1995), ‘Decision making in political systems: Veto players in presidentialism, parliamentarism, multicameralism and multipartitism’, British Journal of Political Science, 25, pp. 289-325. -Ganghof, S. (2003), ‘Premises and Pitfalls of Veto Players’ Analysis, Swiss Political Science Review, pp. 1-25 |
| 7 |
Anayasal Tasarım: Politik Sistem 1 |
Mainwaring, S. (1993), ‘Presidentialism, multipartism, and democracy: the difficult combination’, Comparative Political Studies, 26, pp. 198–228. -Shugart M. S. and J. M. Carey (1992), Presidents and Assemblies. Constitutional design and Electoral Dynamics, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 1-27. |
| 8 |
Anayasal Tasarım: Politik Sistem 2 |
Mainwaring, S. (1993), ‘Presidentialism, multipartism, and democracy: the difficult combination’, Comparative Political Studies, 26, pp. 198–228. -Shugart M. S. and J. M. Carey (1992), Presidents and Assemblies. Constitutional design and Electoral Dynamics, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 1-27. |
| 9 |
Anayasa Yargısına Bakış |
Ginsburg, T. (2003). Judicial Review in New Democracies: Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases. Cambridge University Press. -Hirschl, R. (2004). The Political Origins of the New Constitutionalism. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies. 11(1). |
| 10 |
Yargı Bağımsızlığı |
Hilbink, Lisa. 2012. "The origins of positive judicial independence." World Politics 64 (4): 587-621. -Clark, Tom S. 2009. "The separation of powers, court curbing, and judicial legitimacy." American Journal of Political Science 53 (4): 971-989. |
| 11 |
Anayasal Kimlik |
Jacobsohn, G. J. (2010). Constitutional Identity. Harvard University Press. |
| 12 |
Otoriter Anayasacılık |
Scheppele, K, L. (2018). Autocratic Legalism. University of Chicago Law Review, 85, p.545. -Landau, D. (2013). Abusive Constitutionalism. UC Davis Law Review, 47, 189–260. |
| 13 |
Türkiye’de Anayasa Yapım Başarısızlığı I |
Metinler temin edilecektir |
| 14 |
Türkiye’de Anayasa Yapım Başarısızlığı II |
Metinler temin edilecektir |
Kadir Has Üniversitesi'nde bir dönem 14 haftadır, 15. ve 16. hafta sınav haftalarıdır.
