| Week | Subjects | Related Preperation |
| 1 |
Why Theory? What Theory? |
Steve Smith (2007), ‘Introduction: Diversity and Disciplinarity in IR Theory’, in Tim Dunne, Milja Kurki and Steve Smith (eds.) International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, (Oxford: Oxford University Press): 1-13 [henceforth: Dunne et al.] Milija Kurki and Colin Wight (2007), ‘International Relations and Social Science’, in Dunne et al., 14-35 |
| 2 |
Why Theory? What Theory? (cont.) |
Kahler, Miles (1997) “Inventing International Relations,” in Michael Doyle and John Ikenberry, (eds.), New Thinking in International Relations (Boulder: Westview Press): 20-53 Katzenstein, Peter, Robert Keohane, and Stephen Krasner (1998) “International Organization and the Study of World Politics,” International Organization, Vol. 52, No. 4: 645-685. Schmidt, Brian C (2002), “On The History and H |
| 3 |
Political Realism |
Morgenthau, Hans (1948) Politics Among Nations (New York: Knopf), ch. 1-2 Mearsheimer, John J. Tragedy of Great Power Politics (New York: W. W. Norton, 2001): 1-54. Wagner, R. Harrison. “What Was Bipolarity?,” International Organization, Vol. 47, No. 1 (Winter 1993): 77–106 Lake, David. “Anarchy, Hierarchy, and the Variety Of International Relations,” International Organization Vol. 50, No. 1 (Win |
| 4 |
Political Realism (cont.) |
Lebow, Richard Ned “The Long Peace, the End of the Cold War, and the Failure of Realism”, International Organization, 48, 2, (Sping) 1994, σελ. 249-277 Wohlforth, William, ‘Realism and the End of the Cold War’, International Security, 19, Winter 1994/95, σελ. 91-129 Ashley, Richard, “The Poverty of Neo-realism”, International Organization, 38(2), Spring 1984, σελ. 225-86. Gilpin, Robert (1988) “Th |
| 5 |
Liberalism |
Panke, Diana and Thomas Risse (2007) “Liberalism,” in Dunne et al., ch. 5. Doyle, Michael (1986) “Liberalism and World Politics,” American Political Science Review, 80(4): 1151-1169. Deudney, Daniel and G. John Ikenberry (1999) “The Nature and Sources of Liberal International Order,” Review of International Studies, 25(2): 179-196. Keohane, Robert O. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the |
| 6 |
Liberalism (cont.) |
Jervis, Robert. “Cooperation under the Security Dilemma,” World Politics, Vol. 30, No. 2 (January 1978): 167-214 Owen, John M. “How Liberalism Produces Democratic Peace,” International Security, Vol. 19, No. 2 (Autumn 1994): 87-125 Layne, Christopher. “Kant or Cant: The Myth of the Democratic Peace,” International Security Vol. 19, No. 2 (Autumn 1994): 5- 49 Martin, Lisa L. (2007) “Neoliberalism,” |
| 7 |
Marxism |
Rupert, Mark (2007) “Marxism and Critical Theory,” in Dunne et al., ch. 8. Rosenberg, Justin (1994) “The Empire of Civil Society,” in The Empire of Civil Society: A Critique of the Realist Theory of International Relations, London: Verso, ch. 5. Hoffman, Mark, ‘Critical Theory and the Inter-paradigm Debate’, Millenium: Journal of International Studies, 16(2), 1987, σελ. 231-49 |
| 8 |
Critical Theories |
Cox, Robert (1981) “Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory,” Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 10(2): 126-155. Linklater, Andrew (1992) “The Question of the Next Stage in International Relations Theory: A Critical-Theoretical Point of View,” Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 21(1): 77-98. George, Jim and Campbell, David, ‘Patterns of D |
| 9 |
Constructivism |
Wendt, Alexander (1992) “Anarchy is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics,” International Organization, 46(2): 391-425. Ruggie, John Gerard (1998) “What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge,” International Organization, 52(4): 855-885. Ted Hopf (1998) “The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory”, |
| 10 |
The English School |
Dunne, Tim (2007) “The English School,” in Dunne et al. (eds.), ch. 7. Bull, Hedley (1966) “Society and Anarchy in International Relations,” in Herbert Butterfield and Martin Wight (eds.) Diplomatic Investigations: Essays in the Theory of International Relations, London: Allen and Unwin, ch. 2. Bull, Hedley, ‘International Theory: The case for a Classical Approach’, World Politics, 18(3), 1966, σε |
| 11 |
Poststructuralism |
Campbell, David (2007) “Poststructuralism,” in Dunne et al., ch. 11. Gregory, Donna U. (1989) “Foreword,” in James Der Derian and Michael Shapiro (eds.), International/Intertextual Relations: Postmodern Readings of World Politics, New York: Lexington Books, pp. xiii-xxi. Der Derian, James (1989) The Boundaries of Knowledge and Power in International Relations,” in James Der Derian and Michael Shap |
| 12 |
Feminism |
Tickner, J. Ann and Laura Sjoberg (2007) “Feminism,” in Dunne et al., ch. 10. Cohn, Carol (1987) “Sex and Death in the Rational World of Defense Intellectuals,” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 12 (4): 687-718. Enloe, Cynthia (1989) Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics, Berkeley: University of California Press, chs. 1 and 9. Tickner, J. Ann (19 |
| 13 |
Postcolonialism |
Grovogui, Siba N. (2007) “Postcolonialism,” in Dunne et al., ch. 12. Said, Edward W. (1978), “Introduction,” in Orientalism, New York: Vintage Books, pp. 1-28. Sanjay Seth (2011) “Postcolonial Theory and Critique of International Relations”, Millennium, 40(1): 167-183. Chowdhry, Geeta and Sheila Nair (2002) “Introduction: Power in a Postcolonial World: Race, Gender, and Class in International Rela |
| 14 |
IR Theory and Globalization |
Hay, Colin (2007) “International Relations Theory and Globalization”, in Dunne et al., ch. 14. Rosenberg, Justin (2005) “Globalization Theory: A Post Mortem”, International Politics, 42: 2-74 Rosenberg, Justin (2007) “International Relations – The ‘Higher Bullshit’: A Reply to the Globalization Theory Debate”, International Politics, 44: 450-82 |
At Kadir Has University, a Semester is 14 weeks; The weeks 15 and 16 are reserved for final exams.
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES (LO) AND PROGRAM QUALIFICATIONS (PQ)
| # |
PQ1 |
PQ2 |
PQ3 |
PQ4 |
PQ5 |
PQ6 |
PQ7 |
PQ8 |
PQ9 |
PQ10 |
PQ11 |
| LO1 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
| LO2 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
| LO3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
32 |
3 |
3 |
1 |
Contribution: 1 Low, 2 Average, 3 High
